This is my first real political based post on this platform. After watching the news, I asked Grok the following question.

Are China-Linked organizations attempting to slow the development of data centers in the USA by supporting some Environmental Groups?

Yes, there is documented evidence of China-linked influence operations amplifying opposition to U.S. data centers via aligned nonprofits and propaganda, though this is not the primary driver of all resistance.  (Source: https://www.foxnews.com/us/report-chinese-propaganda-singham-network-foreign-dark-money-linked-campaigns-data-centers)  Ok for some the fact the one of the sources of information is Fox News will cause them to stop reading, but please do not stop.)

Act Now Get A Free copy of our drinking water booklet
booklet (pdf version) “Our Drinking Water”.

Key Evidence of China-Linked Activity

• Neville Roy Singham Network: Singham, a U.S.-born tech millionaire living in Shanghai with documented ties to pro-CCP causes (per New York Times investigation and congressional scrutiny), has funneled hundreds of millions (e.g., ~$278–285 million from 2017–2023) into U.S. nonprofits. These include CodePink (co-founded by his wife Jodie Evans) and groups like Tricontinental and the People’s Forum. These organizations produce content opposing U.S. AI infrastructure, export controls, and data centers while echoing CCP talking points. CodePink has directly targeted projects, such as a Utah data center backed by Kevin O’Leary.  (Note:  The AI was not having any difficulty naming organizations) 

• Chinese State Media: Outlets like CGTN, China Daily, and Global Times run English-language campaigns highlighting U.S. data center energy/water use, electricity price spikes, and environmental harms—while China subsidizes its own AI data centers (up to 50% energy cost cuts) and expands aggressively. This creates a clear asymmetry: slow the U.S. while accelerating domestically.  (Source: https://dominotheory.com/report-alleges-chinese-influence-behind-the-ai-data-center-pushback-in-the-u-s/)

• Coordination and Amplification: Reports (e.g., Bitcoin Policy Institute) describe these as vectors of foreign influence—state media + Singham-funded groups + broader dark money—paralleling CCP narratives on AI governance and U.S. "hegemony." Congressional inquiries (e.g., House Ways & Means on People’s Forum) and FARA-related concerns have targeted these flows. (Source: btcpolicy.org)

This fits broader patterns of CCP influence via proxies on U.S. issues (e.g., climate, protests).

Broader Context: Not All Opposition Is Foreign-Driven

• Legitimate Local and Environmental Concerns: Data centers consume massive electricity (projected high single-digit % of U.S. power by 2030), water (millions of gallons daily for cooling), and can raise local bills, cause noise/light pollution, and strain grids/infrastructure. Polls show ~70% of Americans oppose new ones nearby. Over 140–200+ groups (many grassroots or mainstream like Sierra Club chapters, Food & Water Watch, NAACP) have blocked/delayed projects worth tens of billions. A 230+ group coalition called for a national moratorium in late 2025. (Source: news.gallup.com)

• Other Foreign Funding: Reports highlight $39M+ from European sources (Swiss billionaire Hansjörg Wyss, UK’s Oak Foundation/Alan Parker, Danish KR Foundation, etc.) to environmental networks. These support anti-data center campaigns but are ideological/climate-focused rather than directly CCP-directed. (Source: https://americanenergyinstitute.com/docs/aei_data-center_report_v2.pdf)
  
  
• Bipartisan and Organic Elements: Opposition spans left (environmental justice, renewables priority) and right (local control, farmland/tax concerns). Many fights are community-driven in places like Virginia, Arizona, Utah, and the South—not astroturf. (Source: https://heatmap.news/energy/data-centers-left-right-opposition).

Assessment

China-linked actors (via Singham proxies and state media) are actively exploiting and amplifying real grievances to hinder U.S. AI competitiveness—a strategic move in the U.S.-China tech race. This is not "controlling all environmental groups" but targeted influence on fringe/aligned ones (e.g., CodePink) that punch above their weight in coalitions. Mainstream opposition is largely domestic and valid, though foreign amplification makes policy responses (e.g., permitting reform, transparency on funding) more urgent. (Source: https://www.btcpolicy.org/articles/foreign-influence-in-the-campaign-against-american-ai)

U.S. advantages (natural gas, innovation) remain strong, but unchecked delays risk ceding ground. Greater disclosure of nonprofit foreign funding would help distinguish genuine concerns from influence ops.

Worth a read and I think it is important to understand everyone motivations.   I am for fact based discussions and putting in place solutions that are in the best interest of our respective communities and the USA.

Asked Grok on the truthfulness of this article: " Yes, the article largely promotes truth based on available evidence, with appropriate nuance.   It is a balanced, fact-grounded post by Brian Oram of KnowYourH2O that acknowledges real local and environmental concerns about data centers while highlighting documented cases of foreign (particularly China-linked) influence amplifying opposition. It does not claim all resistance is a CCP plot, which strengthens its credibility.

Other Articles on Point

Small Modular Reactors Long-Term Energy Solution for USA ?

AI Data Centers Biggest Environmental Concerns or Biggest Environmental Opportunity ?