As a young man, I graduate high school with a 5th grade reading level and did not learn that I was dyslexic until I entered college. Within about 1 year of hard work, I learned phonics, reading strategies that worked for me, and started the path to improving my reading and writing skills. The topic of K-12 education is a passion and it is critical that my fellow citizens children can read, write, understand mathematics, learns our countries history and civics, and learns how to think for themselves.

One of the key goals for the Know Your H20 Platform is to Educate and Inform.  I ask Grok the following question: Is the K-12 education program in the USA in total collapse. Grok's response:

K-12 education in the US is not in total collapse, but large-scale efforts have underperformed relative to massive spending increases, with clear signs of stagnation followed by decline—especially since the mid-2010s, accelerated by the pandemic. Outcomes lag what the investment and America's resources should deliver, particularly in foundational skills for average and lower-performing students.

Understanding the ground beneath us matters too. If you're passionate about science-based education, explore our Soil Science Guide to Soils: The Vital Life-Giving Layers Beneath Our Feet — a practical, data-driven resource for educators, students, and curious minds.

Key Performance Data

National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP, "Nation's Report Card") shows the clearest picture:

• Long-term progress occurred from the 1990s into the early 2010s (especially in math), then stalled or reversed. Declines began pre-pandemic around 2013–2015 and hit lower-performing students hardest, widening gaps.
  
  
• 2024 results: National scores remained below 2019 (pre-pandemic) levels across grades and subjects. Reading continued declining from 2022 to 2024 in grades 4 and 8; math saw slight 4th-grade recovery but stagnation or further issues in 8th grade. Twelfth-grade math and reading were lower than 2019.
  
  
• Proficiency remains low: Roughly 30–35% at or above proficient in reading/math for many grades; large shares (e.g., ~33% of 8th graders in reading) below basic. Gaps between top and bottom performers widened.

PISA 2022 (15-year-olds, international comparison):

• Math: 465 (slightly below OECD average of 472); ranked around 26th–28th out of 81 systems. Down significantly from prior years.
  
  
• Reading: 504 (above OECD 476); strong ranking (~6th).
  
  
• Science: 499 (above OECD 485); solid (~10th).
  
  
• US math performance trails top performers (Singapore, East Asia) but holds up better in reading/science. Subgroup variation is huge—US Asian and White students often match or exceed top international levels, while overall averages are pulled down by other groups.

Spending has risen dramatically:

• FY 2024 national average: Record ~$17,619 per pupil (up 6.6% from 2023). Highest states exceed $25k–$30k+; lowest around $11k.
  
  
• Real (inflation-adjusted) per-pupil spending roughly doubled or more since the 1990s/early 2000s, with total K-12 spending in the hundreds of billions annually. Yet long-term achievement gains were modest at best and have reversed in recent years. Many high-spending states do not lead in outcomes (e.g., Massachusetts and New Hampshire often outperform higher-spending peers like New York or New Jersey on NAEP).

Chronic absenteeism spiked during the pandemic and remains elevated (~25–28% nationally in recent data, up sharply from pre-pandemic ~15%), strongly linked to worse outcomes. It affects disadvantaged students disproportionately but rose across district types.

Why the Shortfalls?

No single cause explains everything—it's a combination of policy, incentives, instruction, and external factors. Evidence points away from simple "more money" fixes and toward deeper structural and cultural issues.

1. Inefficient use of resources and weak incentives (not primarily underfunding).
Spending has increased far more than outcomes. Money often flows to administration, benefits/pensions, and non-instructional areas rather than proven classroom practices. Research consistently shows weak or inconsistent links between broad spending increases and achievement gains once basic adequacy is met. Diminishing returns are evident.

2. Instructional methods and curriculum priorities.

• Reading: Long dominance of approaches de-emphasizing systematic phonics (favoring context/guessing) contributed to struggles. States adopting "science of reading" (explicit phonics + structured literacy) have seen gains in some cases.
  
  
• Math: Shifts toward discovery/inquiry methods over explicit instruction and practice sometimes reduced mastery of fundamentals.
  
  
• Broader shifts: Emphasis on social-emotional learning, equity frameworks, or non-academic goals has sometimes crowded out core skills. Pre-pandemic "learning recession" (declines starting ~2013) coincided with accountability easing after No Child Left Behind and Common Core implementation challenges.

3. Governance, monopoly, and lack of competition.
Traditional public schools operate with limited accountability and competition. Teachers' unions and tenure can protect underperformers. Evidence on school choice (charters, vouchers, education savings accounts) is mostly positive overall:

• Charters often produce stronger gains, especially for disadvantaged, Black, and Hispanic students.
  
  
• Competitive pressure from choice improves nearby public schools.
  
  
• Participant outcomes are mixed on test scores (some short-term dips, longer-term gains in attainment like college enrollment) but parent satisfaction is high.

4. External and cultural factors.

• Smartphones/social media proliferation (starting ~2010s) aligns with achievement stalls/declines—linked to reduced attention, less recreational reading, and mental health issues.
  
  
• Family structure and parenting: Two-parent households, time spent on academics, and cultural emphasis on education correlate strongly with outcomes. Chronic absenteeism reflects deeper engagement problems.
  
  
• Pandemic learning loss was severe (especially for younger/lower-performing students) and only partially recovered; remote learning and closures amplified pre-existing weaknesses.

5. Demographic realities and persistent gaps.

Average group differences exist (e.g., Asian Americans often lead, followed by Whites, with larger gaps for Black and Hispanic students on NAEP/PISA). These have proven stubborn despite interventions. Within-group variation is enormous—policy should prioritize effective practices that lift all boats rather than assuming uniform outcomes or sole blame on schools. Cognitive distributions, culture, and family factors play roles alongside schooling.

Perspectives differ: Some emphasize poverty, funding inequities, or systemic barriers as primary (with calls for more resources and targeted support). Data shows funding alone rarely closes gaps without better allocation and instruction. Others highlight pedagogical shifts, lowered standards/expectations, ideological priorities in education schools/curricula, and family/cultural changes. Evidence supports elements of both, but the strongest levers appear to be evidence-based instruction, accountability/competition, and addressing non-school factors.

Bottom Line

USA K-12 program delivers uneven results: Strong for top students and in some subjects/states, but mediocre or declining for many in core skills despite record spending. Pre-pandemic trends were already concerning; COVID made them worse. Progress is possible—states/districts adopting phonics, rigorous curricula, and choice mechanisms show better trajectories. Success requires focusing on what works (explicit instruction, competition, basics first) rather than repeating inputs that haven't scaled results. Family engagement, expectations, and cultural attitudes toward learning remain foundational.

AI Review of the Article

References

1. National Assessment Governing Board (NAGB). (2025). 10 Takeaways from the 2024 NAEP Results. https://www.nagb.gov/powered-by-naep/the-2024-nations-report-card/10-takeaways-from-2024-naep-results.html
   
   
2. American Enterprise Institute (AEI). (2025). Many Children Left Behind: The 2024 National Assessment of Educational Progress Results Indicate a Five-Alarm Fire. https://www.aei.org/research-products/report/many-children-left-behind-the-2024-national-assessment-of-educational-progress-results-indicate-a-five-alarm-fire/
   
   
3. American Enterprise Institute (AEI). (2025). Testing Theories of Why: Four Keys to Interpreting US Student Achievement Trends. https://www.aei.org/research-products/report/testing-theories-of-why-four-keys-to-interpreting-us-student-achievement-trends/
   
   
4. OECD / Education GPS. (2023). United States - Student performance (PISA 2022). https://gpseducation.oecd.org/CountryProfile?primaryCountry=USA
   
   
5. FactCheck.org. (2025). Trump Wrong About U.S. Rank in Education Spending and Outcomes. https://www.factcheck.org/2025/02/trump-wrong-about-u-s-rank-in-education-spending-and-outcomes/
   
   
6. U.S. Census Bureau. (2026). Public School Spending Per Pupil Reaches Historic High in 2024. https://www.census.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2026/school-system-finances.html
   
   
7. PERC (Texas A&M). (2026). More Money, Same Results? Two Decades of Evidence on School Spending and Student Achievement. https://perc.tamu.edu/blog/2026/01/school-spending.html
   
   
8. Reason Foundation. (n.d.). Public education at a crossroads: A comprehensive look at K-12 resources and outcomes. https://reason.org/k12-ed-spending/crossroads-report/
   
   
9. American Enterprise Institute (AEI). (2025). Lingering Absence in Public Schools: Tracking Post-Pandemic Chronic Absenteeism into 2024. https://www.aei.org/research-products/report/lingering-absence-in-public-schools-tracking-post-pandemic-chronic-absenteeism-into-2024/
   
   
10. Associated Press (AP News). (n.d.). Reading test scores declined, but these schools improved with phonics. https://apnews.com/article/reading-math-test-scores-education-scorecard-7fa4111ad0de934f664ebb984e830d13
    
    
11. The Policy Scientist. (n.d.). What Explains the Sustained Decline in U.S. K–12 Academic Achievement That Began Long Before the Pandemic? https://www.thepolicyscientist.com/post/what-explains-the-sustained-decline-in-u-s-k-12-academic-achievement-that-began-long-before-the-pan
    
    
12. The New York Times. (2026). Why U.S. Test Scores Are in a 'Generation-Long Decline'. https://www.nytimes.com/2026/05/13/upshot/test-scores-school-districts-us.html
    
    
13. Urban Institute. (n.d.). New Math and Reading Data Illustrate the State of Postpandemic High School Achievement and Attendance. https://www.urban.org/urban-wire/new-math-and-reading-data-illustrate-state-postpandemic-high-school-achievement-and
    
    
14. EdChoice. (2026). Here's What the Research Really Says About School Choice in 2026. https://www.edchoice.org/heres-what-the-research-really-says-about-school-choice-in-2026/
    
    
15. EdChoice. (n.d.). What the Research Really Says About School Choice. https://www.edchoice.org/what-the-research-really-says-about-school-choice/

Other Blog Posts

Mentors: My Path to Becoming a Water Professional

What a Mentee is Looking for from a Mentor

Facts Over Feelings: The Case for Science-Based Environmental Education

Weaponizing Science and the loss of public trust in the Scientific Method